eDNA and Loch Ness

Mark Stoeckle is interviewed in an AP Television segment about searching for the Loch Ness monster using eDNA.  Mark’s interview and footage begins about 2 minutes 50 seconds into the 8-minute segment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5UPXmP5YE0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj8qoHoa0Vg

More fishing for DNA on Martha’s Vineyard


We (Mark Stoeckle and Jesse Ausubel) post new results from water sampling in October 2017 for eDNA on the island of Martha’s Vineyard.  We tested for freshwater fish (light green rows), saltwater fish (blue rows), and other vertebrates (taupe rows).  We tested in four more locations, Upper Lagoon Pond (Oak Bluffs), Mill Brook just below Mill Pond (West Tisbury), Old Millpond (West Tisbury), and Priester’s Pond (North Tisbury).  Priester’s Pond is about two miles north of Mill Pond and feeds into it.  We compared these four locations to two places we tested in 2016, Look’s Pond (freshwater, West Tisbury) and Tisbury Great Pond (saltwater) into which it feeds.

In each case, we sieved DNA from about a cup of water scooped within reach of the shore. The numbers in the columns are the number of DNA “reads” obtained from each sample for each species.  One can think of the number of reads or fragments of DNA as indicative of the abundance of DNA of that species and probably indicative of the abundance of the species itself, although different species of animals shed DNA at different rates.

The first two columns on the left show the results from 2016, for example, lots of American eel DNA in Look’s Pond.  In 2017 the Bella Bennett of the Martha’s Vineyard Times covered our initial findings about eDNA on the Island: https://www.mvtimes.com/2017/08/02/fishing-for-dna/

We found some cool things in the new locations.  For example, Mill Pond has DNA of river otters, which are hard critters to see.  The Mill Brook, Millpond, and Priester’s Pond all have muskrat DNA, and all abound in frog DNA.  DNA from all the fish in Priester’s Pond also occurs downstream in Millpond but Millpond has pickerel and eel DNA absent from Priester’s.   The brook has DNA for small stream species such as darters and killifish but not for brown bullhead (similar to catfish) or pickerel, which may need the pond habitat.

We found a mix of DNA for salt and freshwater fish in Upper Lagoon Pond.  We were happy to find menhaden and herring DNA, which means the “herring ladder” gets used.  Most remarkably, we found striped bass DNA in Upper Lagoon Pond, confirming a wild “fish” story from 2016: https://www.mvtimes.com/2016/06/01/late-night-splash-dark-holds-surprise/

We continue to be thrilled by ways that eDNA allows us to discover the animals in the water around us.  For more, see https://phe.rockefeller.edu/blog/2018/01/11/edna-seasonal-fish-abundance-study/ and  https://phe.rockefeller.edu/blog/2017/04/12/fishing-for-dna-paper-published/ .

 

eDNA seasonal fish abundance study

Mark Stoeckle, together with co-authors Lyubov Soboleva (Hunter College) and Zachary Charlop-Powers (Rockefeller University), update their 2017 paper “Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary” (PLOS ONE e0175186). They extended their original six-month study to twelve months, making this one of the longest time series of fish monitoring by eDNA to date. The new analysis shows how little bits of DNA shed by fish track the seasonal movements of fish populations in and out of New York Harbor. eDNA also gives a picture of how the relative abundance of species differs from one habitat to another. These results help open our eyes to how eDNA can improve monitoring of ocean life.

This figure shows how many species were detected (black) and water temperature (blue) over the course of the year.  Other figures and spreadsheets are posted and on FigShare

Fishing for DNA paper published

The new PHE paper “Aquatic Environmental DNA Detects Seasonal Fish Abundance and Habitat Preference in an Urban Estuary” by Mark Stoeckle, Lyubov Soboleva, and Zachary Charlop-Powers appears tpday in PLOS ONE.  The DOI is: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175186

Congratulations to Mark, Lyubov and Zach!

A press release describes the work.

Coverage:

New York One TV 2-minute video

Fish Tracked From DNA ‘Finprints’ Left in Waters off New York U.S. News & World Report – Alister Doyle – Reuters

El ADN residual puede revolucionar el conocimiento de las …W Radio-EFE – Julio Rivas –Durante seis meses, los científicos recolectaron el ADN residual, denominado …

US scientists track fish migration using DNA in water samples Breitbart News

BBC World Service Radio (Science in Action, starts at the 47 sec. mark, 5 1/2 minutes):  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04yxshm#play

A 40 sec. clip is also posted here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04zzxsh

https://www.flyfisherman.com/news/edna-bread-crumbs-track-migrating-fish/

Smithsonian magazine How teeny bits of leftover DNA help scientists track elusive species