DNAHouse

DNAHouse: exploring the urban environment with DNA

“We identified 95 different animal species.”

ostrich, paddlefish, squid, bison

You probably wouldn’t believe me if I told you that all of the species displayed above were found in local supermarkets and homes in New York City. A feather from a duster yielded ostrich DNA. A delicacy labeled “sturgeon caviar” instead turned out to be from the strange-looking paddlefish. A popular Asian snack was revealed as giant flying squid. Bison DNA was found in a dog biscuit.

We found DNA evidence all around us. We found DNA “name tags” in all kinds of human and pet foods including raw, cooked, dried, and processed items. We obtained DNA from dried soup mix, scrambled eggs, dog food, chicken McNuggets, hamburger, beef jerky, bologna, yogurt, cheese and even butter. By analyzing DNA, we traced tiny, unrecognizable bits of once-living things to their source.

We could identify animals from what they left behind in the environment. We found tell-tale DNA in dried-out horse manure in Central Park, a pigeon feather on the sidewalk and a shed snakeskin.

DNAHouse attracted news interest

  • New York Times: “Through DNA testing, two students learn what’s what in their neighborhood.” December 28, 2009 print web
  • New York Post: “Doing Their ‘Pest.’” December 26, 2009 print web
  • Washington Post: “At U.S. dinner tables, the food may be a fraud.” March 30, 2010 print web
  • BioSciences: “DNA barcoding investigations bring science to life.” January 2010 print web
  • NBC evening news December 29, 2009 video
  • Channel One video
  • WNYC January 15, 2010 podcast
  • NPR’s Science Friday: High schoolers give hot dog a DNA test. January 22, 2010. video

DNAHouse investigators

Brenda Tan and Matt Cost, The Trinity School, New York, NY
Advisor: Mark Stoeckle, MD, The Rockefeller University

“We found DNA evidence all around us”

What we did:

We collected 217 specimens from apartments, stores, and outdoors, photographed and labeled them, and delivered our specimens to the American Museum of Natural History for DNA barcode analysis. We matched sequences from our specimens to records in Barcode of Life Database and GenBank.

What we found:

  1. DNA evidence of 95 species.

    Surprise: A genetically distinct “mystery” cockroach that might be a new species. By appearance it looks like the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) but it is genetically different from other American cockroaches in the databases.
  2. DNA “name tags” survived in processed foods.

    Surprises:
    • 16% of food items were mislabeled (e.g., “sheep’s milk cheese” made from cow’s milk)
    • water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)(aka “yak”) is the source of buffalo mozzarella
    • Canned goods were an exception; only 1/20 yielded DNA, probably due to heat and acid conditions
  3. DNA in household items, including feather duster (ostrich) and hairbrush (human).
  4. DNA helped us be expert identifiers, including for items that were unrecognizable. 
  5. DNA was durable indoors and out, helping identify humans and other animals from what they leave behind.
    • Human DNA from an old hairbrush
    • Pigeon DNA from a feather on the sidewalk
    • Horse DNA from dried manure in Central Park

For more information


About the Bar Code of Life site
This web site is an outgrowth of the Taxonomy, DNA, and Barcode of Life meeting held at Banbury Center, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, September 9-12, 2003. It is managed by Mark Stoeckle at the Program for the Human Environment (PHE) at The Rockefeller University.

Contact: mark.stoeckle@rockefeller.edu

About the Program for the Human Environment
The involvement of the Program for the Human Environment in DNA barcoding dates to Jesse Ausubel's attendance in February 2002 at a conference in Nova Scotia organized by the Canadian Center for Marine Biodiversity. At the conference, Paul Hebert presented for the first time his concept of large-scale DNA barcoding for species identification. Impressed by the potential for this technology to address difficult challenges in the Census of Marine Life, Jesse agreed with Paul on encouraging a conference to explore the contribution taxonomy and DNA could make to the Census as well as other large-scale terrestrial efforts. In his capacity as a Program Director of the Sloan Foundation, Jesse turned to the Banbury Conference Center of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, whose leader Jan Witkowski prepared a strong proposal to explore both the scientific reliability of barcoding and the processes that might bring it to broad application. Concurrently, PHE researcher Mark Stoeckle began to work with the Hebert lab on analytic studies of barcoding in birds. Our involvement in barcoding now takes 3 forms: assisting the organizational development of the Consortium for the Barcode of Life and the Barcode of Life Initiative; contributing to the scientific development of the field, especially by studies in birds, and contributing to public understanding of the science and technology of barcoding and its applications through improved visualization techniques and preparation of brochures and other broadly accessible means, including this website. While the Sloan Foundation continues to support CBOL through a grant to the Smithsonian Institution, it does not provide financial support for barcoding research itself or support to the PHE for its research in this field.