A year ago in Science, Jones et al. described a new species of African monkey, Lophocebus kipunji, documenting their report with field observations, sound recordings, and photographs. This led to legalistic wrangling over whether the species could be said to exist if there was no specimen! Fortunately, the suspense is relieved by Davenport et al. in this month’s Science, in which they provide morphologic and DNA information based on a specimen recovered from a farmer’s trap. Although the authors relied on mitochondrial DNA evidence to establish the monkey belongs in a new genus, Rungwecebus, the actual sequence data is not listed among diagnostic characters in the species or genus description. Routine inclusion of DNA barcode sequences could improve the usefulness of formal species descriptions, assisting primate conservation efforts that monitor bushmeat trade, for example.
Where is my barcode?
1 thought on “New species descriptions could benefit from DNA barcodes”