To rapidly map biodiversity, stomatopods suggest start with DNA

In “Estimating diversity of Indo-Pacific coral reef stomatopods through DNA barcoding of stomatopod larvae” (FirstCite early online publication in Proceedings Royal Society Biology) Paul Barber and Sarah Boyce, Boston University, look at Squilla maculata, Dictionaire D'Histoire Naturelle, Orbigny, 1849a what is thought to be a well-understood group, stomatopods, commonly known as mantis shrimp. Stomatopods are marine crustaceans distinct from true shrimp and are thought to include about 400 species worldwide. Like many marine species, they have a bipartite life cycle where dispersal is achieved through a planktonic larval developmental stage. However, larval stages are notoriously difficult to identify morphologically. Barber and Boyce first established a database of COI DNA barcodes from adult forms of nearly all known species. They then applied DNA barcoding to planktonic larvae collected in light traps at locations in the Pacific Ocean and Red Sea. Comparison of Stomatopod larva, https://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/gallery.htmsequences from 189 larval forms revealed 22 distinct larval operational taxonomic units (OTUs), but a minority of these matched known species, suggesting that stomatopod species diversity is underestimated by a minimum of 50% to more than 150%. Their results support general use of DNA barcoding as a rapid, relatively-inexpensive first step in cataloging marine species with planktonic larvae. A similar approach has been applied on land by Smith et al “DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar“.

DNA barcode OTUs, such as found in these studies, are not equivalent to species descriptions and are not sufficient to establish systematic phylogeny. In my view, these studies indicate that DNA barcodes can be permanent indexers for filing and retrieving biologic information in the encyclopedia of life.  Routinely incorporating DNA barcoding into biological surveys will enhance the long-term value of expensive field work. 

Zooplankton sequenced at sea, illuminating life in the dark

The deep oceans are the largest biotic space on earth, but remain largely unexplored.  Census of Marine Life scientists recently trawled the Atlantic between the southeast US coast and the Mid-Atlantic ridge, focusing on the zone of perpetual darkness that lies below about 1000 m, to inventory and photograph the variety and abundance of zooplankton–the tiny sea animals that form a vital link in ocean food chains. The 20 day cruise completed April 20 is part of the ambitious gobal inventory of zooplankton by 2010 (Census of Marine Zooplankton (CMarZ), a Census of Marine life initiative. As reported in Sciencefor the first time DNA sequencing was performed on the rolling seas, telescoping into just three weeks what would normally represent years of laboratory work. 

Clio pyramidata, one of the species sequenced at sea by CMarZ scientistsAccording to Ann Bucklin, lead scientist for CMarZ and Head of the University of Connecticut Marine Sciences Department, “we are just starting to realize how little we know about species variety. We used to think we knew many species well, but the advent of DNA barcoding has radically altered that perception.  Genetically distinctive species of zooplankton are being found with increasing frequency.”  

Inspired by Mars exploration, DNA sequencing gets much smaller, may be ready for field work soon

Blazej et al PNAS 103:7240, 2006ABI’s smallest sequencer is about the size and weight of a house air conditioning unit [ABI 310: 95 kg (208 lbs); 61 x 56 x 86 cm (24 x 22 x 34 in)]. Researchers who developed the Mars Organic Analyzer for detecting extraterrestrial life recently turned their attention to DNA sequencing. In 9 May 2006 PNAS Blazej, Kumaresan, and Mathies from the University of California, Berkeley, report on a microfabricated DNA sequencer comprised of three 10 cm glass wafers. Using 1 femtomole of DNA template and a 250 nanoliter reaction chamber, the device performs thermal cycling, DNA purification, and capillary electrophoresis, generating reads of up to 556 bases with 99% accuracy. Based on their results “the template/reagent requirements can be reduced an additional 100-fold, and a fully integrated microfluidic genomic sequencing system should also lead to significant infrastructure and labor savings.”

Faster, cheaper, more portable sequencing should facilitate “point-of-use” DNA barcoding devices for identifying specimens in the field, detecting invasive species at the customs station, and sorting through museum drawers for undescribed species, for example.    

How many plant species are there? Facing success, some taxonomists falter

In Nature 13 april 2006Gardens in full bloom” by Emma Marris highlights the increasing importance of botanical gardens as centers of molecular research. One scientific goal is to compile a working list of known plant species. According to Nature, “plans for the ultimate database inevitably lead to talk of DNA barcoding. If species-specific differences in defined DNA sequences were matched with a species name in some kind of database, an untrained person could use a sequence or a DNA-chip to read the barcode in a botanical sample, send it to the database, and get back a name and all other necessary taxonomic data….Apart from its undoubted geeky appeal, such a technology would in principle save a lot of time and drudgery. Carrying out identifications for colleagues at home and round the world is time consuming and uncompensated. The use of barcoding would free up people to do their own research.”

But Peter Raven, Missouri Botanical garden, is cautious about such a scheme. He worries about how much time and effort it would take and asks “what would one do with barcodes for the 13,000 or so moss species?”

Raven’s question is like a cosmologist asking “why map the distribution of galaxies?” There is likely no way to understand the origins and patterning of biodiversity other than counting species and mapping their distributions. A rapid, simple method for identifying specimens such as DNA barcoding can make this possible. Studying a species-rich group of early terrestrial colonizers such as mosses, which live in some of the coldest and dryest environments as well as in the tropics, and provide habitats for a variety of invertebrates, might be a good place to start.

https://bryophytes.plant.siu.edu/grimmia.htmlDNA analysis can also help identify new moss species. In “Cryptic species within the cosmopolitan desiccation-tolerant moss Grimmia laevigata“, Fernandez et al describe 2 cryptic species with overlapping geographic distributions. Their samples were collected only in California, so a world survey might reveal many more hidden species. The authors conclude “the results emphasize the need to make molecular characterization of species a standard part of ecological analyses of populations and communities”.

Selective sweeps limit mitochondrial diversity in animals

An exciting paper in Science 28 April 2006 “Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals” by Eric Bazin, Sylvain Glemin, and Nicolas Galtier from Universite Montpellier, France, calls into question current thinking in population genetics. The authors looked at intraspecific variation in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA using sequence data collected from public databases into Polymorphix database. Contrary to expectations from population genetic theory, there was “no correlation between mtDNA polymorphism and species abundance”. Analysis of non-synonymous (amino acid changing) and synonymous (silent) changes indicated that reduced mitochondrial diversity within species reflects positive selection. They conclude “mtDNA appears to be anything but a neutral marker and probably undergoes frequent adaptive evolution… mtDNA diversity will in many instances, reflect the time since the last event of selective sweep, rather than population history and demography.” Taken together, these findings help explain the general observation of constrained intraspecific mitochondrial variation in animals, even in organisms with enormous population sizes. Recurrent selective sweeps are natural tests of species boundaries and help explain why mtDNA genealogies generally capture the biological discontinuities recognized by taxonomists as species (Avise and Walker PNAS 96:992, 1999), in short, why DNA barcoding works! It is expected that large data sets generated by DNA barcoding surveys will help refine this analysis and identify possible ecological or biological correlates, providing insight into what drives selective sweeps. I close with a question: if a species is morphologically and ecologically stable, does it nonetheless undergo repeated selective sweeps?

https://www.fishesnpets.net/explore/explore/ChangiBeach05012002/changipoint31.jpg

150 My of selective sweeps?

NMNH annual report headlines DNA barcoding

The lead story in the US National Museum of Natural History 2005 Annual Report: New Tools for Understanding Nature, entitled “Barcoding the Planet” highlights the museum’s organizational and research involvement in the international scientific effort “to develop a system for rapidly and inexpensively identifying the approximately 1.7 million known flora and fauna species, and creating an electronic database for the estimated 10 million species across the planet”.  As outlined by Cristian Samper, Museum Director, “the use of DNA barcoding in identifying and distinguishing species could revolutionize the way we do science”. The article concludes with an observation from Lee Weigt, Manager of the Museum’s Laboratories of Analytical Biology “What the human genome research can do for medicine, DNA barcoding can do for biology”

DNA barcoding identifies mystery hummingbird, points toward wide utility in conservation assessments

An unidentified Selasphorus hummingbird spent fall 2005 and winter 2006 frequenting a hummingbird feeder in London, Ontario. As is often true with female or immature hummingbirds, despite close observation and photographs, photo credit shay redmondit was not possible to identify the exact species, in this case whether this was an Allen’s (S. sasin) or Rufous (S. rufus), species native to the western U.S. that normally winter in Mexico. Even in the hand, identification can be difficult and in banding studies most individuals are often simply recorded as “UNHU”, unidentified hummingbird species.

In this case, a single feather the barcoded breast feather spotted beneath the feeder was brought to University of Guelph, Ontario. DNA extracted from the feather and analyzed for COI barcode proved a match for S. rufus

Beyond solving a conundrum for birders, this case points toward a general utility of DNA barcoding in conservation assessments by enabling routine identification of otherwise unidentifiable species, including use of samples from live individuals which may be particularly important in study of threatened or endangered species.  

Palearctic birds barcoding workshop held in Netherlands

Researchers met at Naturalis, the Natural History Museum of Leiden, Netherlands, on 20-21 April 2006 to form plans for barcoding Palearctic birds. The meeting was convened by Per Ericson, Naturalis ABBI Palearctic Regional Chair, Swedish Museum of Natural History, hosted by Rene Dekker, Naturalis, and included representatives from Canada, Denmark, England, France, Iran, Italy, Japan, Norway, Portugal, South Korea, Sweden, and the United States. Additional participants in Palearctic ABBI are welcome–please contact Per Ericson per.ericson@nrm.se.

Discussion topics included sampling strategies based on geographical patterns in Palearctic avian diversity, updating the ABBI compilation of existing avian tissue specimens, using ongoing collecting and ringing operations as additional sources for un- or under-sampled species, cost-effectiveness of DNA sequence recovery from museum skins, facilitation of regional network activities with Barcode of Life Database (BOLD), need for email, website, and/or listserve to monitor progress and plan next steps, potential small and large-scale funding sources including possible low or no-cost sequencing at pre-existing genomic centers, and exciting early results with 600+ COI barcodes from eastern Palearctic birds.  Based on this workshop, the Palearctic group expects much progress over the coming year.

Sometimes taxonomy moves slowly, could use help

In 1998, as part of biodiversity survey to assess the health of New York City’s Central Park, researchers at the American Museum of Natural History collected leaf litter samples. After sorting, the museum sent a collection of Central Park millipedes and centipedes to Richard L. Hoffman, curator for invertebrates at the Virginia Museum of Natural History. After study, Dr. Hoffman sent several specimens he could not identify to scientists in Italy. In July 2002, Italian scientists announced the Central Park centipede was a new species, and named it Nannarrup hoffmani in honor of Dr. Hoffman. In October 2003, Foddai, Bonato, Pereira, and Minelli published the species description in Journal of Natural History. As of April 2006, the journal issue containing the description is available to subscribers or by payment per article.

My summary: 1 new species, found across the street from one of the world’s premier natural history research institutions, recognized as a new species 4 years later, published description year 5, awaiting public access year 8.  I believe that DNA barcoding can provide taxonomists with scientific tools and help attract funding to accelerate this process.

DNA helps save sharks

Many shark species are threatened by overfishing, including the Natural History April 2006 The Biggest Fish by Steven Wilsonfilter-feeding whale shark Rhincodon typusThe Ocean Conservancy reports “many sharks fall victim to finning, the process of slicing off a shark’s fins and tossing it back into the water. Highly prized for use in the delicacy shark fin soup, shark fins support a very lucrative market. Although the U.S. Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000 made this practice illegal in all U.S. waters, finning remains legal in most parts of the world.” In The USA regulations prohibit possession of any part of protected species, but how to identify dried fins? The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration recently confiscated a ton of dried shark fins and brought charges against dealers based on DNA identification of protected shark species.  A DNA barcode library together with rapid, portable methods for sequence analysis will empower enforcement of regulations for many protected species.