Our paper, “Why should mitochondria define species?“, is published open access in Human Evolution 2018; 33:1-40. It recently received a lot popular press attention claiming our work supports creationist views. This interpretation of our work is wrongheaded.
Area of Research: DNA Barcoding
National Geographic on eDNA
An article by Steve Leahy for National Geographic about our National Conference on Marine Environmental DNA
New DNA tool ‘changes everything in marine science’
Also in the news net:
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Newsletter
Leading Practitioners Of eDNA Science Gather To Discuss New Tool’s Possibilities
Thanks to every one of the 100 participants. It was thrilling for all!
Also a good story in the Martha’s Vineyard Times about Linda Fairstein’s new book in which kids collect eDNA on Martha’s Vineyard.
And in the Martha’s Vineyard Gazette: Swimming With the Fishes, Naming Them Too, Monday, December 3, 2018 – 1:58pm.
Mt paper supports Darwinian evolution
The article Why should mitochondria define species?
Stoeckle M.Y., Thaler D.S.
is grounded in and strongly supports Darwinian evolution, including the understanding all life has evolved from a common biological origin over several billion years.
The study follows mainstream views of human evolution. We do not propose there was a single “Adam” or “Eve”. We do not propose any catastrophic events.
AFP coverage of mt DNA paper
Thanks to Marlowe Hood of Agence France Press (AFP) for an extensive article about Why should mitochondria define species? by Mark Stoeckle and David Thaler. Editing of Mr. Hood’s article resulted in a couple of inaccuracies.
While the opening sentence suggests that a handheld barcoding device already exists, such a convenient device remains a few years away, although the process of obtaining barcodes is now standardized, routine, and quick.
The fourth paragraph inquires about diversity increasing with time. Diversity does increase with time. What the paper shows is that while time matters, the population size achieved over the interval of time does not matter.
The study is grounded in and strongly supports Darwinian evolution, including the understanding all life has evolved from a common biological origin over several billion years.
The study follows mainstream views of human evolution. We do not propose there was a single “Adam” or “Eve”. We do not propose any catastrophic events.
More coverage of Why mitochondria define species
The article Why should mitochondria define species?
Stoeckle M.Y., Thaler D.S.
is now fully open access:
DOI: 10.14673/HE2018121037
Coverage in Tekniikan Maailma, Finland: (Widespread genetic research revealed: Human genetic diversity is low – Two people do not differ by more than two percent) https://tekniikanmaailma.fi/laaja-perimatutkimus-paljasti-ihmisen-geneettinen-monimuotoisuus-on-vahaista-kaksi-ihmista-ei-eroa-toisistaan-enempaa-kuin-kaksi-pulua/
and Nachrichten Welt, Germany: Alles andere als besonders: Die winzigen DNA-Unterschiede der Menschheit sind “Durchschnitt” im Tierreich https://nach-welt.com/technik/alles-andere-als-besonders-die-winzigen-dna-unterschiede-der-menschheit-sind-durchschnitt-im-tierreich/
The study is grounded in and strongly supports Darwinian evolution, including the understanding all life has evolved from a common biological origin over several billion years.
The study follows mainstream views of human evolution. We do not propose there was a single “Adam” or “Eve”. We do not propose any catastrophic events.
Mark Stoeckle mitochondria paper in Human Evolution
Mark Stoeckle and David Thaler publish “Why should mitochondria define species?” open-access (DOI: 10.14673/HE2018121037) in the journal Human Evolution following a study of mitochondrial DNA from about 5 million specimens covering about 100,000 animal species. The paper argues that humans are far from special: humanity’s tiny mt DNA differences are “average” in the animal kingdom. Moreover, as with humans, over 90% of animal species today likely originated 100,000–200,000 years ago.
RealClearScience runs a good article about Stoeckle-Thaler, “What Can ‘DNA Barcodes’ Tell Us About Evolution and Ourselves?”
The study is grounded in and strongly supports Darwinian evolution, including the understanding all life has evolved from a common biological origin over several billion years.
The study follows mainstream views of human evolution. We do not propose there was a single “Adam” or “Eve”. We do not propose any catastrophic events.
Other coverage:
The Independent, UK Genetic differences between people across the world are no greater than differences between pigeons https://uk.news.yahoo.com/genetic-differences-between-people-across-184451249.html?guccounter=2
Europa Press, newswire, Spain La diferencia genética entre humanos, en el promedio de las especies https://www.europapress.es/ciencia/laboratorio/noticia-diferencia-genetica-humanos-promedio-especies-20180521172546.html
Agencia EFE, Spain Demostrado, no eres nada excepcional (Demonstrated, you’re nothing exceptional https://sevilla.abc.es/ciencia/abci-demostrado-no-eres-nada-excepcional-201805211531_noticia.html
RIA Novosti (newswire), Russia: Scientists have not found differences in the genetic diversity of humans and animals) https://ria.ru/science/20180521/1521018801.html?referrer_block=index_archive_1
Animal species and mitochondria
Video of Some Adventures in Urban Barcoding Keynote Address
Keynote address by Jesse at the Urban Barcode Project and Urban Barcode Research Program Symposium, hosted by the DNA Learning Center, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory at the New York Academy of Medicine, New York, May 25th 2017.
Fishing for DNA paper published
The new PHE paper “Aquatic Environmental DNA Detects Seasonal Fish Abundance and Habitat Preference in an Urban Estuary” by Mark Stoeckle, Lyubov Soboleva, and Zachary Charlop-Powers appears tpday in PLOS ONE. The DOI is: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175186
Congratulations to Mark, Lyubov and Zach!
A press release describes the work.
Coverage:
New York One TV 2-minute video
Fish Tracked From DNA ‘Finprints’ Left in Waters off New York U.S. News & World Report – Alister Doyle – Reuters
El ADN residual puede revolucionar el conocimiento de las …W Radio-EFE – Julio Rivas –Durante seis meses, los científicos recolectaron el ADN residual, denominado …
US scientists track fish migration using DNA in water samples Breitbart News
BBC World Service Radio (Science in Action, starts at the 47 sec. mark, 5 1/2 minutes): https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04yxshm#play
A 40 sec. clip is also posted here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04zzxsh
https://www.flyfisherman.com/news/edna-bread-crumbs-track-migrating-fish/
Smithsonian magazine How teeny bits of leftover DNA help scientists track elusive species
eDNA Seawater
On September 13, 2016 Jesse delivered a lecture on Marine biodiversity revealed by extracellular DNA in seawater as part of the conference celebrating the 70th birthday of Russia’s Shirshov Institute of Oceanology. Thanks to Mark Stoeckle, who leads PHE’s eDNA work.