Rockefeller University

Program for the Human Environment

National Conference on Marine Environmental DNAThe Marine Science & Policy Series

Recent Publications

Recent eDNA publications recommended by plenary speakers

Technology

Capture enrichment, alternative to PCR. Wilcox et al, Mol Ecol Res, 2018:1-10. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1755-0998.12928

Long-range PCR. Deiner et al, Methods Ecol Evol 2017, 8:1888-1898. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.12836

Bioinformatics

Fish genetic database and HTS pipeline. Sato et al, Mol Biol Evol 2018, 35:1553-1555 academic.oup.com/mbe/article/35/6/1553/4970566

DADA2 HTS pipeline. Callahan et al, Nat Methods 2016, 13:581-583. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927377/

LULU HTS pipeline. Froslev et al, Nat Comm 2017, 8:1188. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-01312-x

Spatial and temporal resolution and eDNA biology

Ancient DNA. Zobel et al, Nat Comm 2018, 9: 139 www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02421-3

Zooplankton community structure. Djurhuus et al, Limnol Oceanogr: Methods 2018, 16: 209-221. aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/lom3.10237

Quantification. Doi et al, Freshwater Biol 2017, 62: 30-39. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/fwb.12846

Dynamic habitat/Riverine fish diversity. Pont et al, Sci Rep 2018, 8: 10361. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-28424-8

Spatial/temporal resolution; qPCR in river. Tillotson et al. Biol Conserv 2018, 220: 1-11. https://kellyresearchlab.com/s/Tillotson_et_al_2018.pdf

Effects of tides on nearshore eDNA. Kelly et al, PeerJ 2018, 6: e4521. peerj.com/articles/4521/

Seasonal fish abundance, habitat preference in urban estuary. Stoeckle et al, PLOS ONE 2017, 12: e0175186. journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175186

Reviews

Prospects and challenges. Cristescu et al, Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2018, 49: 209-230. www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306

Prospects and challenges. Deiner et al, Mol Ecol 2017, 26: 5872-5895. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mec.14350

Cost eDNA vs electrofishing. Evans et al, Fisheries 2017, 42: 90-99. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03632415.2017.1276329